Sizing a Parallel Flow and Counter Flow Heat Exchangers: Detailed Calculation Guide
Detailed steps to determine the necessary length of the parallel flow heat exchanger.
In this tutorial, we'll explore how to size a parallel flow concentric
heat exchanger.
Here, hot oil is cooled by water that jackets it.
The given information includes:
Oil:
Enters at 100°C and leaves at 60°C
Mass flow rate: 0.15 kg/s (kilograms per second)
Heat capacity: 2131 J/kg°C (joules per kilogram degrees Celsius)
Convective heat transfer coefficient: 38.8 W/m²°C (watts
per meter squared degrees C)
Water: Enters at 25°C and leaves at 50°C
Convective heat transfer coefficient: 2250 W/m²°C (watts per meter
squared degrees C)
We aim to determine the length of the tube required for the necessary
cooling. We'll make a couple of assumptions: negligible heat loss to the
surroundings and a thin wall between the fluids, implying no conductive heat
resistance between them.
Governing Equation
Our heat transfer rate (𝑄) is given by the equation:
Q=U×A×ΔT log mean
Where:
𝑄 is the heat transfer rate.
𝑈 is the overall heat transfer coefficient.
𝐴 is the wetted surface area.
Δ𝑇log mean is the log mean temperature difference.
We'll rewrite this equation in terms of the length (𝐿) of the
heat exchanger.
Step-by-Step Calculation
Calculate Heat Transfer Rate (𝑄)
𝑄=𝑚˙×𝐶𝑝×Δ𝑇
𝑄=0.15 kg/s×2131J/kg°C×(100°𝐶−60°𝐶)
𝑄=12,786W
Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient (𝑈):
𝑈=(1/ℎoil+1/ℎwater)-1
𝑈=(1/38.8W/m2°C+1/2250W/m2°C)−1
Log Mean Temperature Difference ΔT log mean
ΔT 1 (entrance): 100°𝐶−25°𝐶=75°𝐶
Δ𝑇2 (exit): 60°𝐶−50°𝐶=10°𝐶
Δ𝑇log mean=((Δ𝑇1−Δ𝑇2)/ln(Δ𝑇1/Δ𝑇2))
Δ𝑇log mean=((75°𝐶−10°𝐶)/ ln (75°𝐶/10°𝐶))
Δ𝑇log mean≈32.2°𝐶
Calculate Length L
𝐿=((12,786 W)/(38.1 W/m2°C)(𝜋)(0.03 m)(32.2°𝐶))
𝐿≈110.6 meters
Conclusion
The length of the parallel flow heat exchanger required to achieve the
necessary cooling is approximately 110.6 meters. This calculation considers the
specific parameters and assumptions outlined above.
Sizing a Counter-Flow Heat Exchanger
Detailed steps to determine the necessary length of the cross flow heat exchanger.
We are going to look at a concentric counter-flow heat exchanger.
In this type of heat exchanger, the hot fluid (in our case, oil)
enters the heat exchanger in a direction opposite to the cooling fluid, which
is water. The water enters the heat exchanger at one end while the oil exits it
at the other end, counterflow to the water.
Analysis and Calculation
We’ll perform an analysis similar to that for a parallel
flow heat exchanger, focusing on finding the length of the heat exchanger. The
key difference lies in the counterflow arrangement.
We will use the governing equation:
Q=U×A×ΔT log mean
Where:
Q is the heat transfer rate.
U is the overall heat transfer coefficient.
A is the heat transfer area.
ΔT log mean is the log mean temperature difference.
We will rewrite this equation in terms of the length of the
heat exchanger.
Log Mean Temperature Difference (LMTD)
In a counterflow heat exchanger, the calculation of Δ𝑇log
mean differs from that in a parallel flow heat exchanger. Here’s how we
determine it:
Calculate Δ𝑇1
ΔT 1 =T oil in −T water out
Δ𝑇1=100∘𝐶−50∘𝐶=50∘𝐶
Calculate Δ𝑇2
ΔT 2 :Δ𝑇2=𝑇 oil out−𝑇 water in
Δ𝑇2=60∘𝐶−25∘𝐶=35∘𝐶
Calculate Δ𝑇 log mean
Δ𝑇 log mean=Δ𝑇1−Δ𝑇2/ln(Δ𝑇1/Δ𝑇2)
Δ𝑇log mean =50∘𝐶−35∘𝐶/ln(50∘𝐶/35∘𝐶)≈42∘𝐶
Length Calculation
Using the values from a similar heat exchanger with
parallel flow:
Heat transfer rate (Q): 12,786 watts.
Overall heat transfer coefficient (𝑈): 38.1 W/m²°C.
Diameter (𝐷): 0.03 meters.
Δ𝑇log mean : 42°C.
The length (L) of the heat exchanger is calculated as:
𝐿=𝑄/(𝑈×𝜋×𝐷×Δ𝑇log
mean)
𝐿=12,786 watts /( 38.1 W/m2°C×𝜋×0.03 m×42∘𝐶)
L≈84.8 meters
Comparative Analysis
When compared to the length of a parallel flow heat
exchanger (110.6 meters), the counterflow heat exchanger is shorter. This
difference arises because the temperature difference is greater along the
length of the tube in a counterflow arrangement, requiring less surface area
for the same amount of heat transfer.
Final Thoughts
Understanding the differences between counterflow and
parallel flow heat exchangers and accurately calculating the required length is
crucial for efficient heat exchanger design. The counterflow design often
proves more efficient due to the greater temperature gradient, resulting in a
shorter and more compact heat exchanger.
Comments
Post a Comment